Florida Once Again at Center of Debate Over Voting Rules
SIDEBAR: Voting Early in Florida Harder Under New, Restrictive Law
Florida’s hanging chads and butterfly ballots in 2000
ignited the divisive battle that ended with the U.S.
Supreme Court denying an election recount, effectively
declaring that George W. Bush won the presidential
election by 537 votes.
Another potentially close election is ahead, and the
nation’s largest swing state is again at the center of
a partisan debate over voting rules — this time, a
fight about the removal of non-citizens from Florida’s
voter roll and how the state oversees groups who
register voters.
It is set against a national backdrop of a bitter fight
between Democrats who say voting rights of students and
minorities are endangered and Republicans who say that
voter fraud is widespread enough to sway an election.
While many other states have considered laws that would
require that people show a photo ID before they can
vote, Florida has taken a different tack. Republicans
there wrote a law in 2011 that they said would
eliminate voter registration fraud by more closely
controlling third-party registration, early voting
hours and voter address updates.
“With the old law, some things weren’t illegal or
designated as fraud,” said Rep. Dennis Baxley, an Ocala
Republican and funeral home owner who sponsored the
bill.
Voting rights advocates were most concerned about these
features of the new law: reducing from 10 days to 48
hours the time that third-party groups had to hand in
voter registrations and cutting early voting days from
14 to eight, including eliminating the Sunday before
Election Day. Those whose address has changed to
another county since they registered, must cast a
provisional ballot and confirm their new address within
two days.
Of the roughly 22 million Florida votes cast since
2000, the Florida Department of Law Enforcement has
received only 175 complaints of voting-related fraud,
11 of which led to convictions, according to data
obtained by News21.
Baxley said his bill was a proactive step. “We wanted
to prevent mishap and mischief.”
For Navene Shata, a 21-year-old south Florida college
student, the changes meant she would have to update her
address at least a month before voting. She works 30
hours a week around a busy class schedule and
involvement with student government.
“I do keep watch and want to see what the candidates
have to say,” Shata said, “but voting is frustrating
when these pointless things get in the way.”
No Democrats voted for the final version of Florida’s
2011 election law changes. Two Republican senators,
Paula Dockery and Mike Fasano, opposed the measure,
Fasano said, when supporters didn’t present much
evidence of fraud.
“The whole process was poor. Major changes were made in
committee, and none of it was vetted,” Dockery said.
“When one party has two-thirds of the vote, you can
overrule anything. People go off to extremes.”
Gov. Rick Scott, who signed the 2011 law, took an
interest in voter rolls when an analysis by the Florida
Departments of State and of Highway Safety and Motor
Vehicles found 180,000 Floridians were registered to
vote, had driver’s licenses but had not confirmed their
citizenship status.
Secretary of State Ken Detzner discussed the issue with
election supervisors in April. The state cut the list
to 2,700 voters before sending it to county officials
to verify citizenship status.
The problem? The shorter list included many citizens.
What’s become known as the voter purge worried many —
from legal voters who were incorrectly targeted, to
county officials to voting rights advocates.
Again, there is uncertainty in Florida, a state with
troubled election history. Poll taxes were required
until 1937, and voting rule changes in five counties
are subject to federal review because of a pattern of
civil rights violations.
The Department of Justice in June unsuccessfully sued
in federal court to stop the voter removal, and another
suit from four civil rights groups is pending.
Federal law prohibits sweeping state voter removals
within 90 days of a federal election, and Florida has
an Aug. 14 primary. But a federal judge in late June
said the state can remove confirmed non-citizens.
“It’s the timing, it’s the fear-mongering,” said Myrna
Perez of the Brennan Center for Justice at New York
University School of Law, a public policy group that
opposed many voting rule changes nationally. “This
scare tactic that there are hordes of non-citizens
voting is wrong.”
Third-party registration
Neither the 2000 presidential election controversy nor
the current disputes much mattered to a group of Miami
high school students who registered to vote in May.
“Eh, kinda. That was like 12 years ago. I was 5,” said
Kristena Swanson, 17, a Southwest Miami High School
senior and one of 318 students who registered May 30 in
the school’s auditorium. “But, yeah, I know how bad the
voting issues have been here before.”
Miami-Dade Public Schools became a Florida third-party
voter registration group in March. Sixty district
schools registered more than 10,000 high school
students on April 4. They held a second drive May 30,
and at school year’s end, 12,514 Miami-Dade students
had registered — Florida’s third-largest registration
group total.
Under the 2011 law, voter registration groups that
formerly had 10 days to turn in completed registration
forms were given just 48 hours to do so. They faced a
$50 fine for each form turned in more than two days
after completion, among other restrictions. But
organizations statewide developed strategies to turn in
voter registration forms within 48 hours, as the 2011
law required.
“When the law changed,” said Millie Fornell, a
Miami-Dade associate superintendent, “we at the
district office sat down and said, ‘How do we take the
onus away from the schools?’”
The day after Miami-Dade’s second voter drive in May,
however, a federal judge threw out the 48-hour rule,
reverting to the previous 10-day period.
Baxley said he wasn’t that upset with the decision. “I
don’t think they got much for their money on the
lawsuit,” he said “If they want 10 days instead of two,
fine.”
“They” are the League of Women Voters, the Florida
Public Interest Research Group Education Fund and Rock
the Vote, federal lawsuit plaintiffs. The league and
Rock the Vote suspended registration drives for 13
months.
“We need the state to settle down and make sure people
can be proud of Florida’s elections,” said Deirdre
Macnab, the league’s Florida president. “Registering
voters is our most popular job, and it was the first
thing we did in 1939.” Its efforts were more informal
door-to-door canvassing until the 1970s when counties
first started deputizing registrants.
About 100 other third-party groups, including the
nonpartisan National Council of La Raza, which
advocates for Latino civil rights, continued
registering voters throughout the past year.
“We don’t tell people who or what to vote for. We just
want them to register,” said Natalie Carlier, La Raza’s
regional coordinator. And its canvassers do not only
register Hispanics.
On a humid May afternoon, about 20 La Raza canvassers
gathered in an upstairs room of their nondescript
office building near downtown Miami. Carlier stood in
the middle of the canvassers’ half-circle, speaking to
part-time workers who cover parts of Miami several
hours a day, five days a week.
Carlier fielded questions and problems that the
canvassers recently encountered. Charts on the wall
noted each day’s voter tally. A paper cutout of a
thermometer’s mercury showed how many voters her group
has to register to reach its goal of 35,000-plus before
November.
Through July, La Raza had registered more than 35,000
voters, according to the Florida Division of Elections.
Barbara Johnson, 36, was born in Cuba to an
African-American father and Cuban mother. She joined La
Raza two years ago on a whim — quitting a retail job —
and became dedicated to the work.
Hundreds of times a day, any time someone walks past
her spot outside a Little Havana supermarket, she has a
rapid-fire approach.
“Hola! Como esta? Esta registrada para votar?” she gets
a curt nod in return from an older woman. “Any updates?
Change of address? New voter card?” Johnson, like other
canvassers, moves easily between English and Spanish.
Angelica Arroyo, 36, came out of a Publix supermarket
and filled out a card with her teenage daughter
watching. “I wasn’t registered and wanted to vote,”
Arroyo said in Spanish. “I would have tried to
register, but I’m happy I found her just now.”
County-to-county address changes
Navene Shata was up early during the school year, in
class all day at Palm Beach State College and worked
almost full time at a nearby CVS.
Her schedule is typical of many working college
students without much free time.
Shata recently moved from Boca Raton to Deerfield Beach
— moving from Palm Beach County to Broward County in
the process — which will help accommodate her new
studies in pharmacy at Nova Southeastern University.
Before the 2011 law, voters could change counties,
update their address on Election Day and vote. Now,
voters who don’t change their county registration
before Oct. 29 can cast a provisional ballot and must
return to the elections office within 10 days of voting
and prove their new address is valid if they want their
provisional ballot counted.
It was not an issue in January’s closed primary, when
only Republicans could vote.
In Broward County, where Shata now lives, voters cast
4,222 provisional ballots in 2008; 3,958 were not
counted — one of the worst acceptance rates in the
state for that election.
Voters who recently moved between counties and don’t
update their registration could face problems in
November. Shata said she’ll make time this summer to
update her registration, although “I don’t understand
why the law was changed.”
The purge, the election
The governor continues to defend the state’s
non-citizen voter purge.
“We’re doing the right thing,” Scott said on CNN in
June. “I can’t imagine anybody not wanting to make sure
non-citizens don’t dilute a legitimate U.S. citizen’s
vote.”
The process began well ahead of the 2012 election. For
months, Florida’s Department of State requested access
to a federal database with better information about
citizenship than the state Department of Motor
Vehicles.
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security denied access,
claiming the database was not designed as a voter-roll
maintenance tool. The state sued, claiming that federal
law requires the database be shared.
The U.S. Department of Justice countersued to block the
purge. The same judge who reversed the 48-hour
third-party registration law said Florida is allowed to
remove non-citizen voters, but most county officials
refused to do so because they do not trust the state’s
list.
Homeland Security agreed in July to share its
Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE)
database, a system that Detzner said updates every 72
hours.
“Keep in mind,” Detzner said, “if we have a name that
we run across the SAVE database and it’s a citizen,
that person will never be processed on down to the
(county election) supervisors. Supervisors are
ultimately the ones that make a decision about taking
someone off of the rolls.”
Michael Ertel, supervisor of elections in Seminole
County, just north of Orlando, is concerned about the
dispute’s effects on voters: “What I don’t want to see
is people reading these stories and then saying, ‘You
know what? The process doesn’t work. Forget it. I don’t
want to vote.’”
Ertel supported the law’s changes and voter-roll
maintenance — presuming it’s conducted properly — but
said he fears the fight could disillusion voters.
“When they don’t go to the polls,” Ertel said, “that’s
a sad bit of collateral damage.”
Andrea Rumbaugh and Joe Henke of News21 contributed
to this article.
Joe Henke was a Hearst Foundations Fellow this
summer at News21.
For comments or feedback, email news@news21.com