Same-day registration could yield high voter turnout in Maine

Same-sex marriage is returning to the ballot in November, three years after Maine voters rejected the law. Election Day registration, which Maine voters restored last year, could increase turnout among same-sex marriage supporters. And with presidential candidates on the ballot, turnout for both sides is likely to be high.

Marriage rights passed in the spring of 2009 by the Democratic Maine Legislature and governor, then the law was rejected in November 2009 when 53 percent voted to repeal it. The People’s Veto repeated last November when voters restored Election Day registration, which the Republican-controlled Maine Legislature ended five months prior.

Republicans generally oppose Election Day registration, saying that it leaves elections vulnerable to error.

Election Day registration could mean higher turnout for same-sex marriage supporters, said Mike Tipping, a magazine blogger and communications director for the progressive grassroots organization that led the People’s Veto in 2011.

“I think it could affect the vote,” Tipping said. “I think that people who are registering for the first time might be more likely to be young, and might be more likely to support marriage rights.”

The 2011 election was the first in 38 years when Maine residents could not 
register and vote on Election Day. Sixty percent of the 400,000 who voted last November, supported Election Day registration. But the turnout to repeal same-sex marriage was greater, drawing 570,000 voters in 2009.

By Alex Remington, News21

 

Elderly voters in Colorado turn to iPads for primary

Elderly voters in Colorado turn to iPads for primary

Bernice Harris, 83, voted in the Colorado primary with the aid of an iPad. Photo by Alia Conley/News21.

Today is Colorado’s primary election, but some Denver residents were able to vote early — not by mail, but with an iPad.

Denver election officials went to senior centers last week and let voters select candidates on paper or on an iPad. Election judges explained how to enlarge the screen image and how to tap the screen to select a candidate.

Bernice Harris, 83, said she hasn’t voted in 10 years, but the technology made it simple.

“It was easy,” she said. “I could see much better. [The election judge] showed me how to use it.”

Harris, who has lived at St. Paul Health Center for three years, said she would like to use an iPad to vote in November.

Through Monday evening, more than 400,000 ballots had been returned, and the majority of Colorado counties choose to vote by mail for the primary.

By Alia Conley, News21

Voter ID report by bipartisan commission still at issue, 7 years later

The bi-partisan Commission on Federal Election Reform issued a 2005 report that recommended 87 changes to the U.S. electoral system. Many of those recommendations have not been implemented, but Robert Pastor, executive director of the commission, said it’s not too late.

“Almost every significant electoral system in the democratic world requires some form
of voter ID for its citizens to vote,” Pastor said. “The United States is one of the very few (that do not) and that’s mainly because our entire electoral administration system is severely lacking and one of the least impartial and professional election administrations in the entire world.”

In recommending that voter ID be required at polls, Pastor said, the commission considered Republican and Democratic views.

“There were two concerns, one by Republicans that an absence of voter ID can lead to
 electoral fraud and, from Democrats, that the inclusion of a voter ID card could lead to
disenfranchisement,” he said, adding that the commission sought a compromise.

Commissioner Spencer Overton, a law professor at George Washington University Law School, dissented, writing that the proposal “would prevent eligible voters from proving their identity with even a valid U.S. passport or a U.S. military photo ID card.”

Overton added that the ID proposal would make “the poor, the disabled, the elderly, students and people of color would bear the greatest burden.”

Overton’s dissent was sharp, but part of the commission’s discussion.

Pastor was disappointed in the reaction from elected officials, he said.

“The people on the commission were eager to listen to each other and to find legitimate areas of agreement,” Pastor said. “Our politicians are not interested in listening to each other and prefer a polarizing political climate. That’s where we are as a country.”

By Caitlin O’Donnell, News21

 

Photo ID opponents struggle to find disenfranchised Tennessee voters

Tennessee’s photo voter ID law took effect in January, and while no lawsuits have been filed, lawyers are looking for affected voters willing to challenge the law.

The American Civil Liberties Union has been trying to file a lawsuit, but no plaintiffs have come forward.

“They remain silent and their right to vote is chilled, through no fault of their own,” said Hedy Weinberg, executive director of the ACLU in Tennessee, “and they’re being labeled as apathetic.”

Many potential clients have been able ultimately to acquire the necessary ID, said attorney George Barrett.

Tennessee is not subject to Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, so officials there do not need federal approval to change state and local election law. States with voter ID challenges such as South Carolina and Texas, which need Section 5 pre-clearance, have lawsuits pending and building a case in these states is easier than in Tennessee, Barrett said, because of the federal requirement.

By Kassondra Cloos, News21

Coffee Break Ballot, June 22: Current Trends in Voting Rights

We suggested earlier this month that the Florida voter list chaos had the potential to move voting rights issues to the forefront of major news media.

That moment might have arrived, judging by the reaction to House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi’s statement yesterday that House Republicans are investigating Attorney General Eric Holder to distract from his legal pursuit of state laws that  suppress voting.

If Politico says the time has come, we are inclined to agree. It’s also highly possible that the anger — on both sides of the proverbial aisle — could fade just as quickly. Attention spans on complicated issues like these tend to be short, especially during the constantly changing landscape of an election year.

For now, our four key search terms are raging on the Twitters, and points and counterpoints are bouncing around the web. We’re excited about the implications.

Stay with us — these issues are important, and we’ve got big things on the way soon.

What We’ve Been Reading

Voter ID Bill Still On Table, Thanks to Procedural Rule,” (Aaron Keck and Anne Brenner, 06/21, WCHL)

Another Look at Voter Photo ID Myths and F.A.Q.’s,” (Alex Rector, 06/22, Civitas Institute)

PA to launch $5 million voter ID campaign with robocalls,” (James McGinnis, 06/22, PhillyBurbs.com)

Election Fraud: California Union Official Voted in WI Recall,” (Brian Sikma, 06/22, BigGovernment)

Rep. Gowdy on Pelosi claim: ‘Stupid’,” (Kevin Robillard, 06/22, Politico)

Republicans’ Voter Suppression Project Grinds On,” (Jonathan Alter, 06/21, BloombergView)

Twitter Trends

Twitter mentions of voter suppression have skyrocketed in the last 24 hours, and you can tell from this helpful chart from social media search engine Topsy.com.

After the contentious recall election in Wisconsin earlier this month, we remarked how  charged terms like “voter suppression” and “voter fraud” are usually only active during elections, when people discussed the process.

But Pelosi’s unexpected comments on voting — and the media explosion covering them — have boosted mentions of voter suppression more than we’ve seen in a while. Sure, Pelosi isn’t especially popular among conservative circles of the electorate, but the manner in which her unexpected comments on the U.S. Department of Justice’s voting rights preservation efforts have been torn apart is surprising.

We imagine the season leading up to the early voting and general election this fall will see similar spikes in our key search terms.

For more, be sure to follow us @WhoCanVote.

Ballots abroad streamline election process

U.S. troops serving overseas and Americans abroad should have an easier time voting in November.

“If you’re a voter today in the military or overseas, you’re in such a better position to vote successfully than ever in history before” said Susan Dzieduszycka-Suinat, president and CEO of the Overseas Vote Foundation.

The federal Military and Overseas Voter Empowerment Act of 2009 requires ballots to be sent 45 days before elections, allows for blank ballots to be sent electronically, eliminates notary requirements and makes an emergency ballot easily available.

A January 2009 Pew Center report found that only about a third of military and overseas ballots counted because these groups received ballots too late to return them in time.

Despite the changes, the voting process isn’t perfect for military and overseas voters, Dzieduszycka-Suinat said.

People in remote locations, especially without computer access, might have trouble, she said. Plus, the act does not apply to state and local elections.

“We’re taking baby steps,” Dzieduszycka-Suinat said. “We’re not at the endpoint for any of this.”

By Sarah Jane Capper, News21

Note: This item corrects an error. In some instances witnesses are required for U.S. voters abroad.  A notary is no longer needed, but some states still require a witness, according to @WeVoteAbroad, a project of the the Union of Overseas Voters.

Florida officials will not release list of non-citizens on voter rolls

In early May, Florida officials suggested that as many as 180,000 potential non-citizens could be on the state’s voter rolls.

The estimate gained publicity for Gov. Rick Scott’s effort to eliminate illegally registered voters, but the list was thereafter slimmed to 2,700 and made public.

The list of 2,700 later turned up many false positives, with frustrated voters wondering why they were targeted. More than 100 on the list were, however, non-citizens, according to Florida Secretary of State Ken Detzner.

But with the list’s accuracy questioned, the larger list of 180,000 has not been released, despite repeated public records requests from news organizations.

Courtney Heidelberg, communications director at the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles (DHSMV), said in an email that the Department of State submitted to them a list of voters, her agency provided the citizenship status for each and sent the matched list of 180,000 back to the Department of State.

But the department will not release it, and the state attorney general’s office does not have a copy, nor does the governor’s office. And the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, the original custodian of records, will not release it.

“Please be advised that DHSMV is not authorized to release information protected by the Driver Privacy Protection Act,” Heidelberg said.

Chris Cate, spokesman for Detzner, said his agency is still reviewing the 180,000 names and will make them available if he and other officials deem it a public record.

By Ethan Magoc, News21

Coffee Break Ballot June 21: Current Trends in Voting Rights

You may not have noticed, but Twitter broke today.

Three times.

That doesn’t mean we weren’t busy reporting, reading the news and building our project, but it does mean that our usual analysis of social media trends in voting rights is a little sparse today.

Still, a Virginia house cat named Scampers did receive voter registration material today, which fits with our post from Tuesday on the dead dog in Virginia. The story didn’t get as much bounce online this morning. That could be related to the Twitter outage and the inclusion of a quote from the Voter Participation Center president who said that stories like the cat and dog items distracted from the center’s real mission.

More on the Twitter outage after these stories.

What We’ve Been Reading

Walter Mondale, Arne Carlson: Reject voter ID measure,” (Walter Mondale and Arne Carlson, 06/20, Minneapolis Star-Trbune)

Pelosi: GOP’s contempt move vs. Holder about suppressing voter rights,” (Jake Sherman, 06/21, Politico)

UPDATE: Governor vetoes four bills, including voter ID,” (Mike Cousineau, 06/20, New Hampshire Union Leader)

Why sloppy drafting will kill the photo ID amendment,” (David Schultz, 06/21, MinnPost.com)

The Real Crisis: 35% of Americans Not Registered to Vote,” (Voter Participation Center, 06/21)

The Supreme Court Speaks, Yet DOJ Won’t Listen,” (David Almasi, 06/21, National Center for Public Policy Research)

Twitter Trends

As mentioned above, Twitter had some technical troubles today. The hour-long outage wreaked havoc on our normal Topsy.com searches, but we were able to notice an interesting spike in mentions of “voter suppression” – which is directly correlated to House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi’s press conference on the Republican opposition to Attorney General Eric Holder.

The California representative accused the Republican Party of using a contempt vote to distract Holder from his attempt to battle voter suppression. Voter suppression is used more infrequently than our more general search terms (“voting rights,” “voter ID” and the charged “voter fraud”), so it was fascinating to see the sharp spike in mentions.

We’ll keep tabs on how long that mention lasts, so follow @WhoCanVote.

Grace Brown: Son inspires fight for enfranchisement

Grace Brown: Son inspires fight for enfranchisement

Grace Brown was a member of Rhode Island's movement to restore voting rights to parolees and probationers. Photo by Maryann Batlle/News21

Grace Brown, a lifetime Rhode Island resident, got involved in the state’s successful grassroots movement to restore voting rights to parolees and probationers, she said, because of her youngest son.

“My son had been in and out of jail, and I was angry as heck with him,” Brown said. “But I had no idea what he in his spirit was going through.”

Rhode Island voters approved a constitutional amendment in 2006 that gave Brown’s son and others like him the right to vote. Now, just residents who are incarcerated are disenfranchised.

“You have to be in charge of your own future. And the more you leave in somebody else’s hands the more you cannot feel responsible, the more you cannot feel proud of the movements, of the decisions that you’ve made,” Brown said.

Brown attended an informational seminar that she said showed her how other felons – men and women – from minority communities were affected by losing their voting rights.

Brown and a friend, whose son also was behind bars, felt after the seminar that they “had to do something because the playing field was definitely not even, and we wanted to do something to kind of knock some of those hills down,” she said.

By Maryann Batlle, News21

Behind the Scenes: This week in the News21 newsroom

The News21 newsroom is a space for constant collaboration and teams of reporters have been meeting and trading ideas about how to best share our investigations of voting rights and voting in the United States.

Here’s a look at what the News21 team has been up to:

Behind the Scenes: This week in the News21 newsroom

News21 fellows Andrea Rumbaugh, left, Maryann Batlle and Carl Straumsheim collaborate in the Chyron Media Center at the Walter Cronkite School of Journalism and Mass Communication at Arizona State University. Photo by Michael Ciaglo/News21.

Behind the Scenes: This week in the News21 newsroom

News21 fellows Jack Fitzpatrick and Ethan Magoc look over documents in the Chyron Media Center in the Walter Cronkite School of Journalism and Mass Communication at Arizona State Univerity. Photo by Michael Ciaglo/News21